'...............
How likely is it that Trump will be permitted to be elected? If he is elected and does not pull in his horns, will he serve out his term?
His appointees will be concerned mainly with their own careers. Their careers are non-existent if they are hard-nosed like Trump, but if they “moderate” Trump and can claim credit for making him reasonable and unifying, they will move up in the establishment. To “moderate” Trump means to defeat his and his supporters’ agenda.
In 2016 with their candidate, Hillary, defeated, the ruling establishment decided that there would be no more fair elections, that their control was more important.
The elite worked to institutionalize election theft so that it was no longer an issue.
The ruling elite have no concern or comprehension of the unintended consequences of their desperate hold on power. They have split the country worse that it was split by the tariff of 1861 that caused the so called “Civil War.” How does a split country stand up to the enemies the US government has created for America?
A government that bases itself on lies will eventually be discredited.
This will be America’s fate.
Recently a reader sent me a book, Hold Back the Day, a science fiction novel about a DEI government that has control of the world and is committed to eliminating all ethnic races. The tyrannical government has a scale from one to ten with whites being one and black Africans, not the milk chocolate brown skin color of American blacks, being 10. The ideal skin color is five. This means not just the genocide of white ethnicities but also of black Africans, Japanese and other Asians, Hispanics. The world’s ethnicities are to be replaced by a new people that never previously existed. It will be a people who have no roots in the existing world, which means cultural genocide as well as racial genocide. This total elimination of diversity is being done in the name of diversity and inclusion.
I don’t know if ethnic Americans, those whose roots are in the United States, pay any attention to corporate advertisements. If they do, whether they are white, brown, Asian, or Hispanic, they will see that corporate advertisements reflect the agenda of eliminating ethnic racial diversity. White women are shown with black men. Black women are shown with Hispanics. White men are shown with Asian, and sometimes Hispanic, women. The children are mixed race. The intent of the ads is to normalize miscegenation. This change in advertising came suddenly and all at once. Clearly it was a change implemented by someone’s agenda. How was this agenda imposed on 90-95% of corporate advertising departments?
You might remember that this advertising change was preceded by forcing African-American faces off of food products, such as pancake mix, and before this by forcing sports teams to drop references to American Indians. It was never explained why it is racist to associate African-Americans with a treat such as pan cakes, or to honor the courage and fighting spirit of American Indians. Everyone simply got on board meekly as if they were unthinking sheep led around by an unknown someone’s agenda.
If a person finds their life partner in a person of a different race or ethnicity, that is fine. It is a personal, private decision. What is objectionable is to use advertising to enable someone or some group to change the perception of normality in order to advance their private agenda. That is what is going on.
I think if not most Americans, then a large percentage of Americans, dismiss the DEI and Critical Race Theory propaganda as some university professor’s nonsense. They don’t realize that it is a threat to society to replace merit with skin color and gender preference, and to teach in public schools that white ethnicities have a history of enslaving and exploiting other ethnicities. When merit is set aside in order to advance specific ethnicities and gender, performance and professionalism suffer. When racial hatred and white guilt are taught in schools, social cohesion suffers. The society moves backward rather than forward.
The Biden regime’s DEI personnel policy reduced diversity by excluding white heterosexual males. There are none in the upper ranks of the Biden government. Now we have an African-Asian woman who might or might not have been born in the US as the Democrat nominee for US President. This suggests that DEI can change things even in a majority white population faster than people can notice. By the time they realize that they have been displaced from power, it is too late. White Americans are being set up as the next victims of pogroms. Indeed, 1,000 of them who attended a Trump rally already have been sent to prison.
This, too, will be America’s fate.
...............'
Quelle:
